Screen on skill, not keywords.
Keyword-matching filters reject good people and trust resumes that can't be verified. Hiearlly screens every applicant on demonstrated skill and a structured AI interview — consistently, without name bias — and returns a ranked shortlist.
Ranked shortlist
3 of 9,842
of employers say automated keyword screening filters out qualified candidates for not matching exact criteria.
Harvard Business School / Accentureof workers admit to lying on their resume — the document you're screening is unreliable.
Forbes / ResumeLabmore callbacks for identical resumes with White-sounding names — manual review is inconsistent.
Bertrand & Mullainathan, NBERThe resume is the wrong thing to screen on
Keyword filters optimise for how a resume is written, not whether the person can do the job — and the resume itself is often unreliable.
Keyword filters reject good people
Automated screening drops qualified candidates who don't phrase their experience to match the posting — 88% of employers admit it happens.
Resumes can't be trusted
When most workers admit to embellishing, screening on the resume alone means ranking candidates on claims you haven't verified.
Manual review is inconsistent
Identical resumes get different outcomes depending on the name at the top — bias and reviewer fatigue creep into every pile.
Skill-based assessment
Every applicant completes a role-fit assessment that's graded objectively — the first signal is what they can do, not what they wrote.
Structured AI interview
A rubric-anchored AI video interview evaluates each candidate on the same questions, so results are genuinely comparable.
Consistent, bias-aware scoring
One rubric for everyone removes the name- and wording-based inconsistency that plagues manual resume review.
Sentiment & communication signal
Responses are scored for communication quality — context a keyword filter can never capture.
Verification on the shortlist
Background verification runs automatically on shortlisted candidates, so claims are confirmed before an offer.
Ranked, decision-ready shortlist
The agent returns a ranked shortlist with a brief per candidate — recruiters review finalists instead of scanning resumes.
Judge what candidates can do, the same way every time
Hiearlly replaces keyword matching with demonstrated evidence, applied identically to every applicant.
One drive, one funnel
Keyword ATS screening vs Hiearlly
What each one actually measures.
Stop screening resumes. Start screening skill.
Bring a high-applicant role and we'll show you screening that evaluates every candidate on what they can actually do.
Sources
- [1] Harvard Business School & Accenture, "Hidden Workers: Untapped Talent," 2021 ↗
- [2] Forbes / ResumeLab, Job Applicant Behavior Survey, 2023 (resume misrepresentation) ↗
- [3] Bertrand & Mullainathan, NBER Working Paper 9873 / AER, 2004 (callback bias) ↗
- [4] HR Dive, reporting LiveCareer's 2025 survey (application abandonment) ↗